Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 16، number In Volume 2، May 2023 ، issue Number 84

Analysis of the cognitive style of Khatm al Qaraib From Khaqani Shervani

Sedigheh Soleymani (Author in Charge)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stylistics is one of the most effective methods of text recognition. Stylistics divides the different levels of the work and examines the text. Khatm al Qaraib, the first a travelogue of Khaqani Sharvani"s poetry, has catchy language and pleasant images. Stylistics can show the clear face of this work. In this article, the Khatm al Qaraib has been reviewed from the approach of critical stylistics

METHODOLOGY: In this article, Fiest, the external and situational context of the text is examined, then the layers or internal levels of the text are analyzed. The method of stylistics is a layer of the main research approaches. In this article, relying on the text of linguistic structures, vocabulary, applied theme with the method Descriptive – Analytical, materials, Component, Theoretical and linguistic structures of Khatm al Qaraib havr been investigated.

FINDINGS: In terms of the construction of words, combinations and new current phrase, the end of Khatm al Qarab is an indicative text. Text words are sensory and there are fewer axstract words. In the level of applied science and rhetoric, similes and metaphors are generally sensory or can be understood without mediation. The simple verb is superior to other verb constructions. From Modality, indicative is more prominent.

CONCLUSION: Khaghani is a poet who fully understands the importance of words and their function in poetry and has given a new and unique form and combination to poetry by using existing words or combinations he made in different situations.

Keyword
Styli , Critical stylistics , Travelogue , Khatm al Qarab , Khaqani Sharvani.

• Ahmadsoltani, Monireh. (1998). Technical ode and Khaqani's imagery, Tehran: Keyhan, p.196.
• Alhoseyni, Rashed ibn Mohammad ibn Hashem. (2004). Establish method in the poetic text, London: Darolhekmat, p. 195.
• Balibar, Etienne, et. al. (2007). About Literature as an ideological form, Translated by Mandana Mansori, Zibashenakht, N. 17, pp. 207- 230.
• Bertens, johanes Willem. (2003). Literary theory: the basics, Translated by Farzan Sojudi, Tehran, Ahang –e- Digar, p. 59.
• Bondari Esfahani. (1977). The history of the Seljuk dynasty, Translated by Mohammad Hoseyn Jalili, Tehran: Bonyad Farhang Iran 1, p.193.
• Dijk, Teun Adrianus van. (2003). Context and Cognition: Knowledge Frames and Speech Act Comprehension, Translated by Pirooz Izadi, et. al, Tehran: Media Studies and Research Center, p. 17.
• Dorpar, Maryam. (2012). Critical stylistics is a new approach in examining style based on discourse analysis, Tehran: Scirnce (Elm), p. 62.
• Eagleton, Terry. (2004). Literary theory an introduction, Translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Markaz, P. 75.
• Fotoohi, Mahmud. (2009). Stylistics, Theories, Approaches, Methods, Tehran: Soxan, p. 295.
• Fotoohi, Mahmud. (2009). “Literary Stylistics, the nature of literary speech, prominence and personalization of language”, Persian Language, No 41, pp. 23- 40.
• Guerin, Wilfred, et. al. (1997). A Handbook of Critical, Translated by Farzaneh Taheri, Tehran: Niloofar, p. 281.
• Hoseyni Farahani, Abolhasan. (1961). Description of Divan Anvari's problems, corrected by Mohammad Taghi Modarres Razavi, Tehran: Tehran University, p. 138.
• Jorjani, Andolghader. (1989). Reasons foe miracles in the Holy Qur'an, Translated by Seyed Mohammad Radmanesh. Mashhad: Astan e Ghods e Razavi, p. 361.
• Jorjani, Esmail ibn Hasan. (1965). Hwarazmshahi reserve (Zakhire Khwarazmshahi), due to the Mohammag Taghi Daneshpazhoh – Iraj Afshar Tehran: Tehran University, P. 160.
• Khaqani Shervani, Badil ibn Ali. (1983). Letters (Monsha’at), corrected by Mohammad Roushan, Tehran: Farzan's book, p. 193.
• Khaqani Shervani, Badil ibn Ali. (1996). Diwan of poems, due to the Seyed Ziaaddin Sajadi, Tehran: Zavvar.
• Khaqani Shervani, Badil ibn Ali. (2007). Khatm al Qaraib, due to the Iraj Afshar, Tehran: Miras Maktoob, Wien: Translated version of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
• Khaqani Shervani, Badil ibn Ali. (2007). Khatm al Qaraib, Introduction, corrected and notes by Yousef Aali Abasabad, Tehran: Soxan
• Khorasani, Fahime, et. al. (2016). “Codes and Modality: two differentiating factors in the discourse stylistics of Nasser Khosrow's poems”, Linguistic essays, 7 (4). pp. 175- 193.
• Luria, Alexander, Romanovich. (2021). Language and Cognition, Translated by Habibullah Ghasemzade. Tehran: Arjmand, p. 82.
• Makaryk, Irena Rima. (2011). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary, Translated by Mehran Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi, Tehran: Hermes, p. 137.
• Meghdadi, Bahram. (1995). Dictionary of Terms of literary criticism from Plato to the Present day, Tehran: Fekre Rooz, PP. 170 18.
• Mihani. Mohammad ibn Monavvar. (1997). Secrets of Al Taeheed in the authority of Sheikh Abi Sa’eed, correction and suspension of Safi'I Kadkani, Tehran: Agah, pp. 203 & 530.
• Natel Khanlari, Parviz. (1987). Persian Language History, Tehran: Nashr Now, vol2. P. 235.
• Perrine Laurence. (1994). Sound and Sense: an introduction to poetry, Translated by Fateme Rake’ii, Tehran: Ettela’at, p.35.
• Qhiyasim Mohammad Taqhi. (1989). An introduction to structural Stylistics, Tehran: The flame of thought, p. 179.
• René Wellek, et. al. (2003). Theory of Literature, Translated by Ziyae Movahhed and Parviz Mohager, Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi, p. 197
• René, Wellek. (2000). A History of Modern Criticism, Translated by Saeed Arbab Shirani, Tehran: Niloofar, p. 17.
• Rezaviyan, Hoseyn. (2014). “Linguistic stylistics of Jalal El Ahmad's short stories”, Rhetorical Linguistic studies, 5 (9). pp. 131- 146.
• Safavi, Korosh. (1981). An introduction to linguistics, Tehran: Book Translation and publishing company.
• Shafii Kadkani, Mohammadreza. (2010). Poetry music, Tehran: Aghah, p. 99.
• Shamisa, Sirous. (2001). General Stylistics, Tehran: Ferdous, p. 18
• Taftazani, Saededin ibn Omar. (2001). Almotavval, description and summary Meftah Al Olum, Abdolhamid Hendavi’s research, Beirut, Dar al Kotob ah Elmiyat, p. 318.
• Yarmohammadim, Lotfollah. (2004). Popular and critical discourse, Tehran: Hermes, p. 134.
• Zomorrodi, Homeyra, et. al. (2017). “Stylistics of Shahriar's poems”, A specialized quarterly magazine on the stylistics of Persian poetry and prose, 10 (3), pp. 171- 190.